Protection of Environment in the Practice of International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes
Authors
1
Associate Professor of International Law, University of Qom, Iran
2
PhD Student of University of Azad (Branch of Qom), Iran
Abstract
The desire of states for economic development on the one hand and maintaining a healthy environment, on the other, raises the issue of conflict between the economy and the environment. States have concluded many treaties to protect the environment, as well as many treaties to support foreign investment. These two legal systems have caused a conflict of interest in the development of countries. To determine the position of environmental protection against the economic interests of foreign investors, it is necessary to examine the international precedent. One of the most important practices in which the conflict between the two can be observed is the precedent of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), which deals with disagreements between foreign investors and the host states in a specialized manner. Therefore, the main question is that in the arbitration precedent of the foreign investment center, to what extent the environment has been protected against the interests of foreign investors? The hypothesis is that ICSID, as an investment authority, takes side with foreign investors in this conflict. However, the descriptive-analytical study showed that inspite of the ICSID background i.e. the cases of Metalclad Corp. and Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. in which investors received priority in their conflict with environmental promoters, in recent cases the ICSID showed preference towards the environmental aspects. This change of precedent showed itself in two cases i.e. Compañía Del Desarrollo De Santa Elena, S.A. Pac Rim Cayman LLC. However, ICSID has determined the compensation for the benefit of the investor for the losses caused by the stoppage of investment, so that a part of the expected benefits of the investor is also compensated reconciling the two sides.
Keywords
ابراهیمی، س. ن. و سلطان زاده، س. 1393. مفهوم سرمایهگذاری در رویه داوری مرکز حل و فصل اختلافات سرمایهگذاری خارجی (اکسید)، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، شماره 50.
ابهری، ح. و فلاح خاریکی، م. 1397. مطالعة تطبیقی مفهوم و کارکرد «دوست دادگاه» در حقوق ایران و کامن لا، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 8.
پیران، ح. 1374-1373. مصادره غیرمستقیم در حقوق بینالملل، و رویه دیوان داوری دعاوی ایران و ایالات متحده ، مجلة حقوقی / شماره 19-18.
دلدار، ع. ؛جلالی م. و رئیسی، ل. 1398. مصادره غیر مستقیم اموال سرمایهگذار خارجی در پرتو مسایل محیطزیستی با تاکید بر منفعت اساسی دولت، فصلنامه پژوهشهای سیاسی و بینالمللی، سال دهم، شماره 39.
زمانی، س. ق. و درونپرور، ا. 1394. مجله دیدگاههای حقوق قضایی، شماره 69.
ضیایی بیگدلی. م. 1387. حقوق بینالملل / عمومی، تهران، انتشارات گنج دانش، چاپ سی و دوم.
ضیایی، س. ی. 1393. جایگاه تعهدات محیطزیستی در حقوق بینالملل سرمایهگذاری، مجله پژوهش حقوق عمومی، شماره 42.
کوروکولا سوریا، ل. و نیکالا، ر. 1390. مبانی حقوق بینالملل محیط زیست، ترجمه: سیدمحمدحسن حسینی، نشر میزان.
موسوی، س. ف. و موسوی فر، س. ح. 1394. اختلاف محیطزیستی آرژانتین و اروگوئه (2010)؛ تبیین برخی مباحث و اصول، فصلنامه مطالعات حقو عمومی, دوره 45، شماره 4.
Cotula, L. 2008. Regulatory Takings, Stabilization Clauses and Sustainable Development, OECD Investment Policy Perspectives.
Emma, A.; Larry, K. & Carol, M. 2006. Regulatory Takings and Environmental Regulation in NAFTA’s Chapter 11,
available at https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/7195/files/wp061014.pdf
Kennedy, K. C. 2001. Matters in Resolving Trade-Environment Disputes, Widener Lay Symposium Journal.
Philippe, S. 2003. Principle of International Environmental Law, Cambridge University Press,.
Sarenmalm, I. 2015. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Environmental Sustainability, Master’s Thesis in International Investment Law.
Schveuer, C. 2009. ICSID Convention: A commentary, second Edition (Uk: Canbridge university press.
