Investigating the Health Status of the Urban Ecosystem (Study Area: Bandar Mahshahr)

Authors
1 Department of Geography, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Geography Department, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran
Abstract
Ecosystem health monitoring means the continuous review of the overall performance of the system, including: monitoring the state of reliability and stability of the structure, performance and processes and the degree of its reversibility after disturbance and tension. Ecosystem health is always monitored by compiling quantitative indicators and examining their changes over time. The present research has investigated and assessed the feasibility of creating a new method for monitoring and evaluating the health of the ecosystem based on spatial indicators obtained from remote sensing technology and geographic information system. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the health status of the urban ecosystem in Mahshahr port. First, we collect the required data, which include multi-temporal satellite images, existing paper maps or ready files of maps and statistics, and demographic and urban land use information, then we create evaluation units and conceptual models and systems of the required indicators and based on them, Analyzing the data and obtaining the necessary information from them, and based on this information, the health of the urban ecosystem has been evaluated and investigated, and finally, the critical, semi-critical and healthy areas and areas have been separated with the relevant maps and diagrams, and suggestions have been made. based on the results of the research to protect the health of the urban ecosystem in the region, so as to open the way for researchers and science seekers in the future and those involved in the affairs. The results of the research showed that 52.1% of the area of the region is in very poor condition, 29.7% is in poor condition and 18.2% is in moderate condition.
Keywords
Subjects

مثنوی، م. ر. و دبیری، م. (1396)، ارزش‌گذاری خدمات اکوسیستم شهری به عنوان ابزاری برای برنامه‌ریزی شهرهایی پایدارتر، مجله منظر، دوره 9، شماره 41، صص 24-35.
معروفی، ا.، سجادی، ژ. و رضویان، م. ت. (1398)، سنجش نابرابری فضایی شاخص‌های سلامت محیط‌زیست شهری. نمونۀ موردی: نواحی کلان‌شهر تهران، مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، دوره 9، شماره 34، صص 116-99.
Adli, M. (2021). Urban stress and mental health. Cities, Heal. Well-Being 1–4.     
Ciscar, J.C., Ibarreta, D., Soria, A., Dosio, A.A.T., Ceglar, A., Fumagalli, D., Dentener, F., Lecerf, R., Zucchini, A., Panarello, L., Niemeyer, S., P´erez-Domínguez, I., Fellmann, T., Kitous, A., Despr´es, J., Christodoulou, A., Demirel, H., Alferi, L., Dottori, F., Vousdoukas, M.I., Mentaschi, L., Voukouvalas, E., Cammalleri, C., Barbosa, P., Micale, F., Vogt, J.V., Barredo, J.I., Caudullo, G., Mauri, A., Rigo, Dde, Libert` a, G., Durrant, T.H., Vivancos, T.A., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Gosling, S.N., Zaherpour, J., Roo, A.De, Bisselink, B., Bernhard, J., Bianchi, A., Rozsai, M., Szewczyk, W., Mongelli, I., Feyen, L., (2018). Climate Impacts in Europe: Final Report of the JRC PESETA III Project. https://doi.org/10.2760/93257.Cortinovis al., 2019:124.
Costanza, R. (1992). Toward an operational definition of health. In: Costanza R, Norton B, Haskell B, editors. Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management. Washington DC: Island Press. p. 239–56.
Costanza, R. (2012(. Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 2012; 45:24–9. Douglas I. Urban ecology and urban ecosystems: understanding the links to human health and well- being[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability;4(4): 385–92.
De Souza Araujo., Ana Carolina Pires., Daniel Souza dos Santos., Flavia ´ Lins-de-Barros., Sandra de Souza Hacon. )2021(. Linking ecosystem services and human health in coastal urban planning by DPSIWR framework, Ocean and Coastal Management, 210, 105728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman. 2021.105728Demuzere et al., 2019:34.
Dickinson, D. C., & Hobbs, R. J. (2017). Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosystem Services, 25, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser. 2017.04.014.
Dou, Y., Zhen, L., De Groot, R., Du, B., & Yu, X. (2017). Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosystem Services, 24, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011.
Douglas, V. L. (2012). Towards an integrative model of place identifcation: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp. 2009.05.006.\
European Environment Agency, 2020. Healthy Environment, Healthy Lives: How the Environment Influences Health and Well-being in Europe.
Fattorini, B., & Regoli, P. (2020). Defning and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2020.09.014.
Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, C.L., & et al. (2018). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760
Guerreiro, S.B., Dawson, R.J., Kilsby, C., Lewis, E., & Ford, A. (2018). Future heat-waves, droughts and floods in 571 European cities. Environ. Res. Lett. 13 https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaad3.
Julian, J. P., Daly, G. S., & Weaver, R. C. (2018). University students’ social demand of a blue space and the influence of life experiences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093178.
Kang, Peng., Chen, Weiping., Hou, Ying., & Li, Yuanzheng, (2018). Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, Science of the Total Environment, 636,1442–1454, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2018.04.427
Kabisch, N., Van Den Bosch, M., & Lafortezza, R. (2017). The health benefts of naturebased solutions to urbanization challenges for children and the elderly – A systematic review. Environmental Research, 159(January), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004.
Li, Yongfa, & Li, Dong. (2014). Assessment and forecast of Beijing and Shanghai's urban ecosystem health, Science of the Total Environment 487, 154–163
Niemelä, J., Saarela, S.R., Söderman, T., & et al. (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 3225–3243.
Rapport, DJ., Costanza, R., & McMichael, AJ. (1998). Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol; 13:397–402.
Shen, Wei, Zhicheng Zheng, Li Pan, Yaochen Qin, & Yang Li. (2021). A integrated method for assessing the urban ecosystem health of rapid urbanized area in China based on SFPHD framework, Ecological Indicators 121, 107071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107071
Spiegel, JM., Bonet, M., Yassi, A., Molina, E., Concepcion, M. & Mast, P. (2001). Developing ecosystem health indicators in Centro Habana: a community-based approach. Ecosyst Health;7(1):15–26.
Su, Meirong, Hong Xie, Wencong Yuea, Lixiao Zhang, Zhifeng Yanga, & Shuhuan Chen. (2019). Urban ecosystem health evaluation for typical Chinese cities along the Belt and Road, Ecological Indicators 101, 572–582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.070
Wong, C.P., Jiang, B., Kinzig, A.P. & et al., (2015). Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecol. Lett. 18, 108–118.
World Health Organization. 2017. Urban Green Spaces: a Brief for Action [WWW Document].https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1516-89132004000200018.
WHO. (2005). Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. New York, US: Ecosystems and human wellbeing health synthesis report.
Xiao, Rui, Yuxiang, Guo, Zhonghao, Zhang, Li, Yansheng. (2022). A Hidden Markov Model based unscented Kalman Filtering framework for ecosystem health prediction: A case study in Shanghai-Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration, Ecological Indicators, 138, 108854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022. 108854
Zagonari, F. (2016). Using ecosystem services in decision-making to support sustainable development: critiques, model development, a case study, and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 548–549, 25–32